Home
Entertainment
Political
Sports
Technology
Education
Religious
Artificial Intelligence
More
Social
Business
Gaming
Health
Should PM Modi have attended the all-party meeting on the Pahalgam terror attack?
Yes, it’s his duty as PM
No, trusted ministers can represent him
Doesn’t matter—action is what counts
Not sure
Submit
The absence of Prime Minister Narendra Modi from the recent all-party meeting following the Pahalgam attack drew criticism from Congress and other opposition leaders. Congress MP Jairam Ramesh emphasized that the PM’s presence could have sent a stronger message of unity and leadership. BJP, however, defended Modi, saying official briefings were conducted by senior ministers and national security agencies.
In times of national crisis, should the country’s top leader be physically present to address concerns, or is delegation enough? This isn’t just about one meeting—it’s about the expectations people have from their leaders during dark times. What do you think? Should Modi have led from the front at the meeting? Vote now and let your opinion be heard.
PMModi
PahalgamAttack
AllPartyMeeting
NationalLeadership
CongressVsBJP
CrisisResponse
Manish Sharma
Author
Do you support the trending “Boycott Turkey” movement on Indian social media platforms?
Do you support Shashi Tharoor leading the Operation Sindoor delegation despite his name missing from Congress’s official list?
YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra Arrested for Alleged Spying for Pakistan—What Are Your Thoughts on This Controversy?
Prime Minister Modi Calls Operation Sindoor the “New Normal” — Do You Think It Has Been Effective in Deterring Terrorism?